Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 560 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is positioned at rank #263 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P630
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Intel UHD Graphics P630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 560 SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the GeForce GTX 560 SE, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 200.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+200.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and GeForce GTX 560 SE
Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.
GeForce GTX 560 SE
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 scores 1,848 and the GeForce GTX 560 SE reaches 1,847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce GTX 560 SE uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Raw compute: 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,848 | 1,847 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 288+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4608 TFLOPS | 0.8479 TFLOPS+84% |
| ROPs | 3 | 24+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Decoder: Gen 9.5 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | Gen 9.5 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 560 SE's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 123.2+902% | 12.3 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.0 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers 200.8% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-67% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.0+201% | 12.3 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT2 | GF114 |
| Release | May 24 2018 | February 20 2012 |
| Ranking | #640 | #706 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics P630 and GeForce GTX 560 SE
