Intel UHD Graphics vs GeForce GTX 1650
Intel UHD Graphics
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 420.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-420.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+420.8%) |
| Longevity | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics and GeForce GTX 1650
Intel UHD Graphics
The Intel UHD Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 10 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,511 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Intel UHD Graphics scores 1,511 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 420.8%. The Intel UHD Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 10 nm+ vs 12 nm. Shader units: 256 (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 750 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,511 | 7,869+421% |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 10 nm+ | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 896+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 2.984 TFLOPS+677% |
| Boost Clock | 750 MHz | 1665 MHz+122% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 56+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics draws 10W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 152.9% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-87% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 151.1+44% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Intel UHD Graphics costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Intel UHD Graphics offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 104.9 |
| Codename | Jasper Lake GT1 | TU117 |
| Release | January 11 2021 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #666 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics and GeForce GTX 1650
