Iris Graphics 540 vs FirePro V5900

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V5900

#112

GRID RTX6000-1Q

MSRP: $6299|Avg: $1500

97%

#113

Quadro RTX 8000

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9999

97%

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

95%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

94%

#275

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

7171%

#290

FirePro V5900

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

100%

#291

FirePro S9000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $156

98%

#294

GRID P40-4Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

96%

#295

RTXA5000-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

96%

#296

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

95%

#300

FirePro W9100

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200

94%

#301

GRID K220Q

MSRP: $469|Avg: $40

94%

#302

GRID T4-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000

92%

#303

FirePro 3D V3700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

88%

#304

GRID T4-1Q

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600

85%

#305

GRID M60-2Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Graphics 540 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V5900 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Iris Graphics 540	FirePro V5900
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Graphics 540 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Graphics 540 Benchmark Check

FirePro V5900 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 540 and FirePro V5900

Iris Graphics 540

The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.

FirePro V5900

The FirePro V5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,232 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Graphics 540 scores 1,270 and the FirePro V5900 reaches 1,232 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 540 is built on Generation 9.0 while the FirePro V5900 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 540) vs 512 (FirePro V5900). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (FirePro V5900).

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	FirePro V5900
G3D Mark Score	1,270+3%	1,232
Architecture	Generation 9.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	14 nm+	40 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.768 TFLOPS+25%	0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs	6	32+433%
TMUs	48+50%	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	FirePro V5900
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Graphics 540 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V5900 has 2 GB. The FirePro V5900 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	FirePro V5900
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (Iris Graphics 540) vs 11.2 (FirePro V5900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	FirePro V5900
DirectX	12 (FL 12_1)+7%	11.2
Vulkan	1.3	None
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Iris Graphics 540) vs None (FirePro V5900). Decoder: Quick Sync vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Iris Graphics 540) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V5900).

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	FirePro V5900
Encoder	Quick Sync	None
Decoder	Quick Sync	UVD 3.1
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP8	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Graphics 540 draws 15W versus the FirePro V5900's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Graphics 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 540) vs 350W (FirePro V5900). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	FirePro V5900
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	84.7+416%	16.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Graphics 540 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro V5900 launched at $599 and now averages $15. The Iris Graphics 540 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Graphics 540) vs 82.1 (FirePro V5900) — the Iris Graphics 540 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 540 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).