Iris Graphics 540
VS
HD Graphics P630

Iris Graphics 540 vs HD Graphics P630

Intel

Iris Graphics 540

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
VS

HD Graphics P630

2016Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The HD Graphics P630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Graphics 540.

InsightIris Graphics 540HD Graphics P630
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the HD Graphics P630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 540 and HD Graphics P630

Intel

Iris Graphics 540

The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.

Intel

HD Graphics P630

The HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 5 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,280 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Graphics 540 scores 1,270 and the HD Graphics P630 reaches 1,280 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 540 is built on Generation 9.0 while the HD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 14 nm+ vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 540) vs 192 (HD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540) vs 0.4224 TFLOPS (HD Graphics P630). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

FeatureIris Graphics 540HD Graphics P630
G3D Mark Score
1,270
1,280
Architecture
Generation 9.0
Generation 9.5
Process Node
14 nm+
14 nm++
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS+82%
0.4224 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1100 MHz+10%
ROPs
6+100%
3
TMUs
48+100%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Graphics 540HD Graphics P630
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureIris Graphics 540HD Graphics P630
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (Iris Graphics 540) vs 12 (12_1) (HD Graphics P630). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureIris Graphics 540HD Graphics P630
DirectX
12 (FL 12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Iris Graphics 540) vs Quick Sync Video (HD Graphics P630). Decoder: Quick Sync vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Iris Graphics 540) vs H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (HD Graphics P630).

FeatureIris Graphics 540HD Graphics P630
Encoder
Quick Sync
Quick Sync Video
Decoder
Quick Sync
Quick Sync Video
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP8
H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Graphics 540 draws 15W versus the HD Graphics P630's 15W — a 0% difference. The HD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 540) vs 1W (HD Graphics P630). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIris Graphics 540HD Graphics P630
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
84.7
85.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Graphics 540 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the HD Graphics P630 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Graphics 540) vs Infinity (HD Graphics P630) — the HD Graphics P630 offers NaN% better value. The HD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureIris Graphics 540HD Graphics P630
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Skylake GT3e
Kaby Lake GT2
Release
September 1 2015
August 5 2016
Ranking
#808
#822