Iris Graphics 540
VS
GeForce GTX 280

Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce GTX 280

Intel

Iris Graphics 540

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280

2008Core: 602 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 280

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
3664%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3520%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
3479%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3473%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3466%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
3446%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
3403%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3390%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3359%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
3349%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
3309%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3302%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
3242%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3240%
#299
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
4040%
#314
GeForce GTX 280
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
100%
#315
Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
#316
Radeon HD 3000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#317
GeForce GT 120
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
95%
#318
Radeon HD 6250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#319
GeForce 6600 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
86%
#320
Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
85%
#321
Radeon HD 3200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
83%
#322
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
78%
#323
Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
77%
#324
Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $79|Avg: $10
76%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
70%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
66%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
59%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Iris Graphics 540 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The Iris Graphics 540 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 280 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 280 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Graphics 540.

InsightIris Graphics 540GeForce GTX 280
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 280 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 540 and GeForce GTX 280

Intel

Iris Graphics 540

The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280

The GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,285 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Graphics 540 scores 1,270 and the GeForce GTX 280 reaches 1,285 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 540 is built on Generation 9.0 while the GeForce GTX 280 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 540) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 280). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 280).

FeatureIris Graphics 540GeForce GTX 280
G3D Mark Score
1,270
1,285+1%
Architecture
Generation 9.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
14 nm+
65 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.768 TFLOPS+23%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
6
32+433%
TMUs
48
80+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Graphics 540GeForce GTX 280
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Graphics 540 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 280 has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 280 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureIris Graphics 540GeForce GTX 280
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (Iris Graphics 540) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureIris Graphics 540GeForce GTX 280
DirectX
12 (FL 12_1)+8%
11.1 (10_0)
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Iris Graphics 540) vs None (GeForce GTX 280). Decoder: Quick Sync vs PureVideo HD (VP2). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Iris Graphics 540) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280).

FeatureIris Graphics 540GeForce GTX 280
Encoder
Quick Sync
None
Decoder
Quick Sync
PureVideo HD (VP2)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP8
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Graphics 540 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 280's 236W — a 176.1% difference. The Iris Graphics 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 540) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 280). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin.

FeatureIris Graphics 540GeForce GTX 280
TDP
15W-94%
236W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
550W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
84.7+1469%
5.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Graphics 540 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 280 launched at $649 and now averages $649. The Iris Graphics 540 costs 100+% less ($649 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Graphics 540) vs 2.0 (GeForce GTX 280) — the Iris Graphics 540 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 540 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureIris Graphics 540GeForce GTX 280
MSRP
$0-100%
$649
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$649
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
2.0
Codename
Skylake GT3e
GT200
Release
September 1 2015
June 16 2008
Ranking
#808
#802