Iris Graphics 540 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Iris Graphics 540
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Graphics 540 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 630.
| Insight | Iris Graphics 540 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Graphics 540 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 540 and Intel UHD Graphics 630
Iris Graphics 540
The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 630
The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Graphics 540 scores 1,270 and the Intel UHD Graphics 630 reaches 1,231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 540 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 14 nm+ vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 540) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 540) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,270+3% | 1,231 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 384+109% | 184 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+81% | 0.4232 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1150 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 6+100% | 3 |
| TMUs | 48+109% | 23 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Graphics 540 draws 15W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 630's 15W — a 0% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 540) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 84.7+3% | 82.1 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Graphics 540 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Graphics 540) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers NaN% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 540 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Skylake GT3e | Comet Lake GT2 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | October 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #808 | #824 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Graphics 540 and Intel UHD Graphics 630
