Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Graphics 540

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Graphics 540 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Iris Graphics 540 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.9% in PassMark G3D (1,270 vs 1,222), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Iris Graphics 540 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Graphics 540

The Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,270 points.

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

The Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,222 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Graphics 540 scores 1,270 and the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual reaches 1,222 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 540) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual).

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
G3D Mark Score	1,270+4%	1,222
Process Node	14 nm+	28 nm
Shading Units	384	768+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Graphics 540 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Graphics 540 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual.

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Graphics 540 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Graphics 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 540) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
TDP	15W-70%	50W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	84.7+247%	24.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Graphics 540 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual launched at $100. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 540 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Graphics 540) vs 12.2 (Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual) — the Iris Graphics 540 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Graphics 540 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Iris Graphics 540	Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP	$0-100%	$100
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	12.2
Codename	Skylake GT3e	—
Release	September 1 2015	August 1 2013
Ranking	#808	#881

Search Iris Graphics 540 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.