Iris Graphics 6100 vs HD Graphics 6000
Iris Graphics 6100
Popular choices:
HD Graphics 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Graphics 6100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 6000.
| Insight | Iris Graphics 6100 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Graphics 6100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Graphics 6100 and HD Graphics 6000
Iris Graphics 6100
The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.
HD Graphics 6000
The HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 873 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Graphics 6100 scores 899 and the HD Graphics 6000 reaches 873 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 6100 is built on Generation 8.0 while the HD Graphics 6000 uses Generation 8.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 384 (HD Graphics 6000). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 6000). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 950 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 899+3% | 873 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+5% | 0.7296 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+5% | 950 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 6 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Graphics 6100 draws 15W versus the HD Graphics 6000's 15W — a 0% difference. The HD Graphics 6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 1W (HD Graphics 6000). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 59.9+3% | 58.2 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Graphics 6100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the HD Graphics 6000 launched at $0 and now averages $10. The Iris Graphics 6100 costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 87.3 (HD Graphics 6000) — the Iris Graphics 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 6100 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 87.3 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Release | January 5 2015 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #913 | #924 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Graphics 6100 and HD Graphics 6000
