Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Quadro 5000
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Quadro 5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $100 for the Quadro 5000, it costs 85% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 579.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+579.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Quadro 5000
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) scores 2,000 and the Quadro 5000 reaches 1,963 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro 5000 uses Fermi, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 352 (Quadro 5000).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,000+2% | 1,963 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Fermi |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 64 | 352+450% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000 has 3 GB. The Quadro 5000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) draws 12W versus the Quadro 5000's 152W — a 170.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 350W (Quadro 5000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 12W-92% | 152W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 166.7+1192% | 12.9 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro 5000 launched at $2499 and now averages $100. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 85% less ($85 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) vs 19.6 (Quadro 5000) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 580.1% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-85% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.3+580% | 19.6 |
| Codename | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | GF100 |
| Release | May 28 2019 | February 23 2011 |
| Ranking | #672 | #687 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and Quadro 5000
