Iris Plus Graphics vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Plus Graphics

15

1,789

0.0%

1,847

+3.2%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 560 SE is significantly newer (2012 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 560 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics.

Insight	Iris Plus Graphics	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%)
Longevity	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Iris Plus Graphics offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $150 for the GeForce GTX 560 SE, it costs 73% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 263.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Iris Plus Graphics	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+263.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Plus Graphics Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 SE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics and GeForce GTX 560 SE

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

GeForce GTX 560 SE

The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics scores 1,789 and the GeForce GTX 560 SE reaches 1,847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 SE uses Fermi 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	GeForce GTX 560 SE
G3D Mark Score	1,789	1,847+3%
Architecture	Generation 11.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	10 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512+78%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS+21%	0.8479 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	24+200%
TMUs	32	48+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	GeForce GTX 560 SE
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	1 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	GeForce GTX 560 SE
DirectX	12_1	12_0
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Encoder	QuickSync	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	QuickSync	NVDEC 1st Gen

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 560 SE's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics	GeForce GTX 560 SE
TDP	15W-90%	150W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	500W
Power Connector	Integrated	2x 6-pin
Length	1mm	210mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	119.3+870%	12.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Iris Plus Graphics costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 263.4% better value.