CPU
GPU
Iris Plus Graphics
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 0). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 826.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-826.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+826.8%) |
| Longevity | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 48.3% better value per dollar than the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+48.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics and Radeon RX 7600
Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Plus Graphics scores 1,789 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 826.8%. The Iris Plus Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 10 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,789 | 16,581+827% |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+2024% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2655 MHz+166% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: QuickSync vs VCN 4.0.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 166.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-91% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 119.3+19% | 100.5 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Iris Plus Graphics costs 84% less ($210 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 48.3% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-63% | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-84% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.7 | 66.3+48% |
| Codename | Ice Lake GT2 | Navi 33 |
| Release | sem dados | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #714 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics and Radeon RX 7600
