Iris Plus Graphics
VS
GeForce GTX 760M

Iris Plus Graphics vs GeForce GTX 760M

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

Boost: 1000 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760M

2013Core: 657 MHzBoost: 657 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760M

#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
94%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
94%
#87
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
252%
#89
228%
#90
227%
#94
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
207%
#95
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
205%
#97
GeForce GTX 760M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#100
GeForce 945M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98
98%
#103
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
96%
#105
GeForce GTX 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
95%
#106
Radeon HD 7470M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12
95%
#110
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 760M is significantly newer (2013 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 760M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightIris Plus GraphicsGeForce GTX 760M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)
Longevity
Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Iris Plus Graphics offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $40 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3.7% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 760M.

InsightIris Plus GraphicsGeForce GTX 760M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+3.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics and GeForce GTX 760M

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics scores 1,789 and the GeForce GTX 760M reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics is built on Generation 11.0 while the GeForce GTX 760M uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760M). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 657 MHz.

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsGeForce GTX 760M
G3D Mark Score
1,789+4%
1,726
Architecture
Generation 11.0
Kepler
Process Node
10 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.024 TFLOPS+1%
1.009 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1000 MHz+52%
657 MHz
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
32
64+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsGeForce GTX 760M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Plus Graphics comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsGeForce GTX 760M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
80 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 760M's 55W — a 114.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsGeForce GTX 760M
TDP
15W-73%
55W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
119.3+280%
31.4
💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) vs 43.1 (GeForce GTX 760M) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 3.7% better value.

FeatureIris Plus GraphicsGeForce GTX 760M
MSRP
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$40
Performance per Dollar
44.7+4%
43.1
Codename
Ice Lake GT2
GK106
Release
sem dados
May 30 2013
Ranking
#714
#725