Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 580.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 460 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 580 and GeForce GTX 460 SE
Iris Pro Graphics 580
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 scores 1,985 and the GeForce GTX 460 SE reaches 1,988 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the GeForce GTX 460 SE uses Fermi, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,985 | 1,988 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 576+100% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.094 TFLOPS+46% | 0.7488 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 9 | 32+256% |
| TMUs | 72+50% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 460 SE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | UVD 4.0 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 draws 45W versus the GeForce GTX 460 SE's 150W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-70% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 210mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.1+232% | 13.3 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE launched at $160 and now averages $50. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 39.8 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $160 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 39.8 |
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | GF104 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | November 15 2010 |
| Ranking | #707 | #683 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Pro Graphics 580 and GeForce GTX 460 SE
