Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Iris Pro Graphics P580

15

2,026

0.0%

Iris Graphics 6100

HD Graphics 630

Iris Plus Graphics 640

Iris Plus Graphics 650

Iris Plus Graphics 950

7,869

+288.4%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is positioned at rank #326 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580

#316

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

804%

#318

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

728%

#319

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

727%

#323

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

661%

#324

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

656%

#326

Iris Pro Graphics P580

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

100%

#327

Radeon E8870PCIe

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

100%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

95%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

95%

#333

GeForce 730A

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

94%

#334

GeForce GT 745A

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

92%

#335

GeForce 710A

MSRP: $35|Avg: $62

92%

#336

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

90%

#338

GeForce MX230

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

90%

#340

RADEON HD6410D

MSRP: $35|Avg: $5

89%

#341

GeForce 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 288.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P580.

Insight	Iris Pro Graphics P580	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-288.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+288.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $60), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 210.7% better value per dollar than the Iris Pro Graphics P580.

Insight	Iris Pro Graphics P580	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+210.7%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($60)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce GTX 1650

Iris Pro Graphics P580

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 scores 2,026 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 288.4%. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm+ vs 12 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P580	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	2,026	7,869+288%
Architecture	Generation 9.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm+	12 nm
Shading Units	576	896+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.21 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+147%
Boost Clock	1050 MHz	1665 MHz+59%
ROPs	9	32+256%
TMUs	72+29%	56

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P580	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P580	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	128 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Iris Pro Graphics P580	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	135.1+29%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 costs 20% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.8 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 210.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).