
Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Iris Pro Graphics P580
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is positioned at rank #326 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Pro Graphics P580
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1018% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics P580.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1018%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1018%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $60), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 76.5% better value per dollar than the Iris Pro Graphics P580.
| Insight | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+76.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Iris Pro Graphics P580
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,026 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 scores 2,026 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1018%. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm+ vs 5 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.21 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,026 | 22,651+1018% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 576 | 4352+656% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.21 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+1723% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 2535 MHz+141% |
| ROPs | 9 | 48+433% |
| TMUs | 72 | 136+89% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 165.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-91% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 135.1 | 141.6+5% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Pro Graphics P580 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $380. The Iris Pro Graphics P580 costs 84.2% less ($320 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.8 (Iris Pro Graphics P580) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 76.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-62% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-84% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.8 | 59.6+76% |
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | AD106 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #678 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















