Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is significantly newer (2020 vs 2011). The Iris Xe Graphics MAX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics MAX.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the GeForce GTX 460 v2, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 22.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics MAX and GeForce GTX 460 v2
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX scores 1,972 and the GeForce GTX 460 v2 reaches 2,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is built on Generation 12.1 while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 1.046 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 v2).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972 | 2,016+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+129% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.534 TFLOPS+142% | 1.046 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 24 |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 v2). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs Legacy (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 v2).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | Legacy |
| Decoder | QuickSync | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 460 v2's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-84% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9+526% | 12.6 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 launched at $199 and now averages $50. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 40.3 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) — the Iris Xe Graphics MAX offers 22.3% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-72% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3+22% | 40.3 |
| Codename | DG1 | GF114 |
| Release | October 31 2020 | September 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #685 | #679 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics MAX and GeForce GTX 460 v2
