Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs GeForce GTX 765M
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 765M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 765M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Iris Xe Graphics MAX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 765M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 765M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics MAX.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 765M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics MAX and GeForce GTX 765M
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
GeForce GTX 765M
The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX scores 1,972 and the GeForce GTX 765M reaches 2,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is built on Generation 12.1 while the GeForce GTX 765M uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 765M). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 863 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972 | 2,014+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.534 TFLOPS+91% | 1.326 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+91% | 863 MHz |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 765M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 765M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 765M). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 765M). Decoder: QuickSync vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 765M).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | QuickSync | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 765M's 75W — a 100% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 765M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-67% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9+193% | 26.9 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | — |
| Codename | DG1 | GK106 |
| Release | October 31 2020 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #685 | #680 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics MAX and GeForce GTX 765M
