
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Quadro M520
Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Quadro M520 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Quadro M520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Quadro M520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $145 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 274.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro M520
2017Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe Graphics MAX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro M520 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌263.6% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Quadro M520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

Quadro M520
The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX scores 1,972 and the Quadro M520 reaches 1,913 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is built on Generation 12.1 while the Quadro M520 uses Maxwell, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 384 (Quadro M520). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1019 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972+3% | 1,913 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.534 TFLOPS+217% | 0.7995 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+62% | 1019 MHz |
| ROPs | 24+200% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+200% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M520 carries 2 GB. Quadro M520 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics MAX and 64-bit on the Quadro M520.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX draws 25W versus the Quadro M520's 25W — a 0% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 350W (Quadro M520). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9+3% | 76.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Xe Graphics MAX came in at $55, while the Quadro M520 launched at $200. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics MAX was 72.5% cheaper ($145 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.9 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) vs 9.6 (Quadro M520) — the Iris Xe Graphics MAX offers 274% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics MAX (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-73% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.9+274% | 9.6 |
| Codename | DG1 | GM108 |
| Release | October 31 2020 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #685 | #695 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















