Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Core i7-9700K
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Core i7-9700K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is positioned at rank #1157 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node) | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Core i7-9700K
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.
Processing Power
The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 92.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K. The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 188.7% lead for the Core i7-9700K.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 8 / 8+700% |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+172% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | — | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Oakville (2003−2004) | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 420 | 14,397+3328% |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K — the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ supports 196% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) vs 2 (Core i7-9700K). PCIe lanes: 0 (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) — the Core i7-9700K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+9900% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 128 GB+6710886300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: false (Mobile Athlon 64 2800+) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ rivals Pentium M 725.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Core i7-9700K
