Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Athlon XP 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Athlon XP 3200+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is positioned at rank 980 and the Athlon XP 3200+ is on rank 1127, so the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 3200+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Athlon XP 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Barton (2001−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Athlon XP 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon XP 3200+
The Athlon XP 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP 3200+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon XP 3200+ — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3200+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the Athlon XP 3200+ uses Barton (2001−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Athlon XP 3200+'s 445 — a 1.1% lead for the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Athlon XP 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 512 kB |
| Process | — | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Oakville (2003−2004) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| PassMark | 450+1% | 445 |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon XP 3200+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ versus DDR-400 on the Athlon XP 3200+ — the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ supports 100+% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 3200+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) and AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 3200+).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Athlon XP 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | A |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 400 | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 4 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) / not specified (Athlon XP 3200+). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Athlon XP 3200+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP 3200+
