Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs E1 Micro-6200T
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
E1 Micro-6200T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is positioned at rank 980 and the E1 Micro-6200T is on rank 1091, so the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Performance Per Dollar E1 Micro-6200T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | E1 Micro-6200T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | E1 Micro-6200T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and E1 Micro-6200T
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $69.
E1 Micro-6200T
The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the E1 Micro-6200T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E1 Micro-6200T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ versus 1.4 GHz on the E1 Micro-6200T — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture, while the E1 Micro-6200T uses Mullins (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the E1 Micro-6200T's 475 — a 5.4% lead for the E1 Micro-6200T.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | E1 Micro-6200T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+43% | 1.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 512K | 1024 kB+100% |
| Process | — | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Oakville (2003−2004) | Mullins (2014) |
| PassMark | 450 | 475+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1 Micro-6200T uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | E1 Micro-6200T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) / not specified (E1 Micro-6200T). Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ rivals Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | E1 Micro-6200T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and E1 Micro-6200T
