CPU
GPU
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Celeron 560
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is positioned at rank 980 and the Celeron 560 is on rank 1199, so the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 560
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Celeron 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Oakville (2003−2004) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Celeron 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 560
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 450 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron 560
The Celeron 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is built on the Oakville (2003−2004) architecture. In PassMark, the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ scores 450 against the Celeron 560's 475 — a 5.4% lead for the Celeron 560.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Celeron 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 2.13 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K | — |
| Process | — | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Oakville (2003−2004) | — |
| PassMark | 450 | 475+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 560 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 400 on the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron 560 — the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 560 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) vs 2 (Celeron 560). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 754 (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) and Santa Rosa (Celeron 560).
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Celeron 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 400+19900% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 | 4 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Mobile Athlon 64 3000+) vs No (Celeron 560). Primary use case: Celeron 560 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ rivals Pentium M 735; Celeron 560 rivals Pentium T2310.
| Feature | Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ | Celeron 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 560
