CPU
GPU
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Popular choices:
GeForce FX Go5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is positioned at rank 737 and the GeForce FX Go5700 is on rank 296, so the GeForce FX Go5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX Go5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9800.
| Insight | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX Go5700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9800 and GeForce FX Go5700
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 46 points.
GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 scores 46 versus the GeForce FX Go5700's 51 — the GeForce FX Go5700 leads by 10.9%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce FX Go5700 uses Rankine, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 480 (GeForce FX Go5700). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 46 | 51+11% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+67% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS | 1.405 TFLOPS+25% |
| ROPs | 16 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 40 | 60+50% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 960 KB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX Go5700 has 512 MB. The GeForce FX Go5700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 640 KB (GeForce FX Go5700) — the GeForce FX Go5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 640 KB+150% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0b | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5700). Decoder: VideoShader HD vs VPE 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5700).
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VPE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VideoShader HD | VPE 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 draws 50W versus the GeForce FX Go5700's 219W — a 125.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9+350% | 0.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on MOBILITY RADEON 9800 and GeForce FX Go5700
