Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4250

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

2009Core: 550 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4250 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

2009

Why buy it

  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 112.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 104.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (102 vs 98), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 112.4% (2.1 vs 1.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Mobility Radeon HD 4250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4250

The Mobility Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT scores 102 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4250 reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is built on TeraScale while the Mobility Radeon HD 4250 uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4250). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4250).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 2400 XTMobility Radeon HD 4250
G3D Mark Score
102+4%
98
Architecture
TeraScale
TeraScale 2
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800 ×2
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.88 TFLOPS ×2
1.12 TFLOPS+27%
ROPs
16 ×2
16
TMUs
40 ×2
40
L1 Cache
160 KB+100%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 2400 XTMobility Radeon HD 4250
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4250 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4250.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 2400 XTMobility Radeon HD 4250
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT draws 30W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4250's 50W — a 50% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 2400 XTMobility Radeon HD 4250
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
3.4+70%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT came in at $49, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4250 launched at $100. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT) vs 1.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 4250) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT offers 110% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 4250 (2010 vs 2009).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 2400 XTMobility Radeon HD 4250
MSRP
$49-51%
$100
Performance per Dollar
2.1+110%
1.0
Codename
M98
Broadway
Release
January 9 2009
January 7 2010
Ranking
#818
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.