
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT vs GeForce 315

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Popular choices:

GeForce 315
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is positioned at rank #697 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 315 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2009). The GeForce 315 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 315 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce 315 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 315 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and GeForce 315

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 192 points.

GeForce 315
The GeForce 315 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 196 points.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT scores 192 and the GeForce 315 reaches 196 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is built on TeraScale while the GeForce 315 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 640 (GeForce 315). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce 315).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce 315 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 192 | 196+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Pascal |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 ×2+25% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.199 TFLOPS+36% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 ×2+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 240 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce 315 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 315 has 512 MB. The GeForce 315 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 512 KB (GeForce 315) — the GeForce 315 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce 315 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 10.1 (GeForce 315). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce 315 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs None (GeForce 315). Decoder: Avivo HD vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 315).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce 315 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo HD | None |
| Decoder | Avivo HD | PureVideo VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT draws 30W versus the GeForce 315's 20W — a 40% difference. The GeForce 315 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 350W (GeForce 315). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce 315 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 20W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4 | 9.8+53% |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $12, while the GeForce 315 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 315 costs 100+% less ($12 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs Infinity (GeForce 315) — the GeForce 315 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 315 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce 315 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $12 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | M98 | GP107 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #818 | #597 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















