Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT vs GeForce GT 120
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 120
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is positioned at rank 697 and the GeForce GT 120 is on rank 317, so the GeForce GT 120 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 120
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 120 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2009). The GeForce GT 120 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 120 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT holds the technical lead. Priced at $12 (vs $40), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 240.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+240.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($12) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and GeForce GT 120
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 192 points.
GeForce GT 120
The GeForce GT 120 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 188 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT scores 192 and the GeForce GT 120 reaches 188 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is built on TeraScale while the GeForce GT 120 uses Pascal, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 384 (GeForce GT 120). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 120).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 192+2% | 188 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Pascal |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 ×2+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.127 TFLOPS+28% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 ×2+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+11% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 120 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 120 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 120) — the GeForce GT 120 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 120). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs No (GeForce GT 120). Decoder: Avivo HD vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 120).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo HD | No |
| Decoder | Avivo HD | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT draws 30W versus the GeForce GT 120's 30W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GT 120 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 350W (GeForce GT 120). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4+2% | 6.3 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $12, while the GeForce GT 120 launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT costs 70% less ($28 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 4.7 (GeForce GT 120) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT offers 240.4% better value. The GeForce GT 120 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $100-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $12-70% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.0+240% | 4.7 |
| Codename | M98 | GP108 |
| Release | January 9 2009 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #818 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and GeForce GT 120
