nForce 750a SLI vs GeForce 9300 SE
nForce 750a SLI
Popular choices:
GeForce 9300 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300 SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The nForce 750a SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9300 SE.
| Insight | nForce 750a SLI | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the nForce 750a SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of nForce 750a SLI and GeForce 9300 SE
nForce 750a SLI
The nForce 750a SLI is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 83 points.
GeForce 9300 SE
The GeForce 9300 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points.
Graphics Performance
The nForce 750a SLI scores 83 and the GeForce 9300 SE reaches 82 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The nForce 750a SLI is built on Kepler while the GeForce 9300 SE uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (nForce 750a SLI) vs 384 (GeForce 9300 SE).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 83+1% | 82 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (nForce 750a SLI) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 11.1 (10_0)+11% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (nForce 750a SLI) vs None (GeForce 9300 SE). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo HD (VP3).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | PureVideo HD (VP3) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The nForce 750a SLI draws 30W versus the GeForce 9300 SE's 33W — a 9.5% difference. The nForce 750a SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (nForce 750a SLI) vs 350W (GeForce 9300 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-9% | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 2.8+12% | 2.5 |
Value Analysis
The nForce 750a SLI launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce 9300 SE launched at $50 and now averages $10. The nForce 750a SLI costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (nForce 750a SLI) vs 8.2 (GeForce 9300 SE) — the nForce 750a SLI offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce 9300 SE is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | nForce 750a SLI | GeForce 9300 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 8.2 |
| Codename | N14P-GT | GM108 |
| Release | April 1 2013 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #616 | #810 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on nForce 750a SLI and GeForce 9300 SE
