Opteron 146
VS
Atom E3825

Opteron 146 vs Atom E3825

AMD

Opteron 146

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2 GHz2003
VS
Intel

Atom E3825

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 146 is positioned at rank 789 and the Atom E3825 is on rank 626, so the Atom E3825 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 146

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
16455%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3107%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2760%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2132%
#456
EPYC 9575F
MSRP: $11791|Avg: $9238
99%
#457
EPYC 7642
MSRP: $4775|Avg: $850
98%
#458
EPYC 7573X
MSRP: $5590|Avg: $3580
98%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
97%
#789
Opteron 146
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#796
Xeon E-2276M
MSRP: $939|Avg: $124
98%
#797
Xeon W3580
MSRP: $294|Avg: $30
98%
#798
Xeon W3690
MSRP: $583|Avg: $140
98%
#800
Xeon E5-2428L
MSRP: $692|Avg: $42
97%
#803
Opteron 6380
MSRP: $551|Avg: $111
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E3825

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
97%
#613
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
838%
#614
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
826%
#615
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
758%
#616
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
755%
#617
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
748%
#619
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
722%
#620
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
693%
#621
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
691%
#622
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
673%
#626
Atom E3825
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#627
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#637
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom E3825 (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 146Atom E3825
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 146 (2003) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 146Atom E3825
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 146 and Atom E3825

AMD

Opteron 146

The Opteron 146 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $60.

Intel

Atom E3825

The Atom E3825 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $73.

Processing Power

The Opteron 146 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Atom E3825 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom E3825 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Opteron 146 versus 1.33 GHz on the Atom E3825 — a 40.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 146. The Opteron 146 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom E3825 uses Bay Trail-I (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 146 scores 505 against the Atom E3825's 525 — a 3.9% lead for the Atom E3825. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureOpteron 146Atom E3825
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz+50%
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
130 nm
22 nm-83%
Architecture
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Bay Trail-I (2013)
PassMark
505
525+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 146 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom E3825 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 146Atom E3825
Socket
940
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom E3825 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Opteron 146 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureOpteron 146Atom E3825
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)