Opteron 6328 vs Pentium Silver N6005

Opteron 6328 vs Pentium Silver N6005 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6328

8 / 8

5,306

+1.0%

Athlon Silver 3050U

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Pentium Silver N6005

4 / 4

5,253

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6328 vs Pentium Silver N6005 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6328 vs Pentium Silver N6005: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6328

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $575 MSRP, while Pentium Silver N6005 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1050% higher power demand at 115W vs 10W.

Pentium Silver N6005

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 115W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6328 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,253 vs 5,306).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6328, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6328 better than Pentium Silver N6005?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6328 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium Silver N6005 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6328 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 28.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6328 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6328 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6328 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $575 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 28.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium Silver N6005 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6328 vs Pentium Silver N6005 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6328

The Opteron 6328 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,306 points. Launch price was $575.

Pentium Silver N6005

The Pentium Silver N6005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,253 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6328 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium Silver N6005 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 6328 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 6328 versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium Silver N6005 — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Opteron 6328 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Opteron 6328 uses the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Silver N6005 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6328 scores 5,306 against the Pentium Silver N6005's 5,253 — a 1% lead for the Opteron 6328. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6328 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium Silver N6005.

Feature	Opteron 6328	Pentium Silver N6005
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+15%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+33%	1.5 MB (total)
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Abu Dhabi (2012)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	5,306+1%	5,253

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6328 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Silver N6005 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.