P102-100 vs GeForce 770M
P102-100
Popular choices:
GeForce 770M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The P102-100 is positioned at rank 201 and the GeForce 770M is on rank 57, so the GeForce 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P102-100
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 770M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The P102-100 uses modern memory architecture. The P102-100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 770M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The P102-100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 770M.
| Insight | P102-100 | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $80 for the P102-100, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 96.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | P102-100 | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P102-100 and GeForce 770M
P102-100
The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce 770M
The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.
Graphics Performance
The P102-100 scores 3,301 and the GeForce 770M reaches 3,246 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P102-100 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 770M uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,200 (P102-100) vs 960 (GeForce 770M). Raw compute: 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100) vs 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce 770M). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 797 MHz.
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,301+2% | 3,246 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3200+233% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.77 TFLOPS+604% | 1.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz+111% | 797 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+233% | 24 |
| TMUs | 200+150% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.2 MB+1400% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB+558% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P102-100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 770M has 512 MB. The P102-100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2.5 MB (P102-100) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce 770M) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB+558% | 0.38 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (P102-100) vs 11.1 (GeForce 770M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+8% | 11.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The P102-100 draws 250W versus the GeForce 770M's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P102-100) vs 350W (GeForce 770M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2 | 43.3+228% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 770M costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (P102-100) vs 81.2 (GeForce 770M) — the GeForce 770M offers 96.6% better value. The P102-100 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $40-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3 | 81.2+97% |
| Codename | GP102 | GK106 |
| Release | February 12 2018 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #560 | #603 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P102-100 and GeForce 770M
