P102-100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
P102-100
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The P102-100 is positioned at rank #201 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P102-100
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 260.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P102-100.
| Insight | P102-100 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-260.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+260.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $80), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 92.1% better value per dollar than the P102-100.
| Insight | P102-100 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P102-100 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
P102-100
The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the P102-100 scores 3,301 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 260.3%. The P102-100 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,200 (P102-100) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,301 | 11,892+260% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3200+25% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.77 TFLOPS+20% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 1755 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 200+150% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.2 MB | 2.5 MB+108% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB+25% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P102-100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2.5 MB (P102-100) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB+25% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (P102-100) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The P102-100 draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P102-100) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2 | 91.5+593% |
Value Analysis
The P102-100 launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The P102-100 costs 46.7% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.3 (P102-100) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 92% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | P102-100 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $249-59% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-47% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3 | 79.3+92% |
| Codename | GP102 | GA106 |
| Release | February 12 2018 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #560 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P102-100 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
