Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Pentium 4 2.80 vs Sempron 3300+

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Pentium 4 2.80

1 Cores1 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.79 GHz2002
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Sempron 3300+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 2 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Pentium 4 2.80 vs Sempron 3300+ Performance Spectrum

Pentium 4 2.80
1 / 1
408
0.0%
brand logoPentium III 1400S
brand logoAtom N270
brand logoPentium M 1.30
brand logoCore Solo T1200
brand logoCore i9-10900F
brand logoXeon W-3335
brand logoXeon w7-3545
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
Sempron 3300+
1 / 1
412
+1.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2100+
brand logoAthlon XP 2500+
brand logoAthlon XP 2700+
brand logoRyzen AI 5 340
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 4 2.80 vs Sempron 3300+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3300+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3300+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3300+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3300+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3300+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3300+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3300+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3300+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3300+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Pentium 4 2.80
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3300+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Pentium 4 2.80 vs Sempron 3300+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 4 2.80

2002

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (408 vs 412).
    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $327 MSRP, while Sempron 3300+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • ❌77.4% higher power demand at 110W vs 62W.

    Sempron 3300+

    2001

    Why buy it

    • ✅+1% higher PassMark.
    • ✅Draws 62W instead of 110W, a 48W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium 4 2.80 better than Sempron 3300+?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium 4 2.80 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3300+ pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3300+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium 4 2.80 is the better buy right now. Pentium 4 2.80 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $327 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Sempron 3300+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium 4 2.80 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2002 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Pentium 4 2.80 vs Sempron 3300+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium 4 2.80

    The Pentium 4 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 3300+

    The Sempron 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 412 points. Launch price was $30.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium 4 2.80 and Sempron 3300+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.79 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.80 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3300+ — a 33% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.80. The Pentium 4 2.80 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3300+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 4 2.80 scores 408 against the Sempron 3300+'s 412 — a 1% lead for the Sempron 3300+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeaturePentium 4 2.80Sempron 3300+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.79 GHz+40%
    2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    512K
    Process
    130 nm
    130 nm
    Architecture
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    Palermo (2001−2005)
    PassMark
    408
    412
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium 4 2.80 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3300+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium 4 2.80Sempron 3300+
    Socket
    PGA478
    754
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%