Pentium M 735 vs Phenom X3 8750

Pentium M 735 vs Phenom X3 8750 Performance Spectrum

Pentium M 735

1 / 1

1,459

+1.0%

1,445

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 735 vs Phenom X3 8750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 735 vs Phenom X3 8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 21W instead of 95W, a 74W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).

Phenom X3 8750

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($195 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 5.0 PassMark/$ ($195 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,445 vs 1,459).
❌352.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 21W.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom X3 8750 better than Pentium M 735?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Phenom X3 8750 is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 735 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom X3 8750 is the better buy right now. Phenom X3 8750 comes in $99 cheaper on MSRP at $195 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Pentium M 735 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 49.3% better value on MSRP (7.4 vs 5.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Phenom X3 8750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium M 735 vs Phenom X3 8750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom X3 8750

The Phenom X3 8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium M 735 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Phenom X3 8750 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X3 8750 — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Phenom X3 8750. The Pentium M 735 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 735 scores 1,459 against the Phenom X3 8750's 1,445 — a 1% lead for the Pentium M 735. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium M 735 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8750.

Feature	Pentium M 735	Phenom X3 8750
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	3 / 3+200%
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	2.4 GHz+41%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	90 nm	65 nm-28%
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Toliman (2008)
PassMark	1,459	1,445

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 735 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium M 735	Phenom X3 8750
Socket	PGA478	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR-333	—
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Pentium M 735) / not specified (Phenom X3 8750). Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy.

Feature	Pentium M 735	Phenom X3 8750
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	None	—
Target Use	Mobile Legacy	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Pentium M 735 was priced at $294, while the Phenom X3 8750 came in at $195. On launch pricing ($294 vs $195), Phenom X3 8750 was $99 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium M 735 delivers 5.0 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Phenom X3 8750 — making the Phenom X3 8750 the 39.6% better value option.

Feature	Pentium M 735	Phenom X3 8750
MSRP	$294	$195-34%
Performance per Dollar	5.0	7.4+48%
Release Date	2004	2008

Search Pentium M 735 on Amazon

Search Phenom X3 8750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.