Pentium M 745
VS
Athlon 64 3100+

Pentium M 745 vs Athlon 64 3100+

Intel

Pentium M 745

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 3100+

1 Cores1 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 745 is positioned at rank 820 and the Athlon 64 3100+ is on rank 1074, so the Pentium M 745 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 745

#808
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1262%
#809
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1243%
#810
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1142%
#811
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1136%
#812
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1126%
#814
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1087%
#815
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1043%
#816
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1041%
#817
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1013%
#820
Pentium M 745
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#824
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#825
Pentium P6100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16.39
97%
#827
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
96%
#829
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
96%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3100+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
65624%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
62008%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
45023%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
13564%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
10744%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
9399%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
5383%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
5313%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
4837%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
4837%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
4783%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
4654%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
4589%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
4570%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
4529%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
97%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
90%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
85%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
84%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
83%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
83%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
81%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
75%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
75%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
74%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
73%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
72%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
70%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
69%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 3100+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium M 745 in both compute-intensive tasks (2.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium M 745Athlon 64 3100+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 745Athlon 64 3100+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 745 and Athlon 64 3100+

Intel

Pentium M 745

The Pentium M 745 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon 64 3100+

The Athlon 64 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 745 and Athlon 64 3100+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Pentium M 745 versus 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3100+ — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3100+. The Pentium M 745 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 64 3100+ uses Lima (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 745 scores 465 against the Athlon 64 3100+'s 475 — a 2.1% lead for the Athlon 64 3100+. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 100 vs 280, a 94.7% lead for the Athlon 64 3100+ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 100 vs 280 (94.7% advantage for the Athlon 64 3100+).

FeaturePentium M 745Athlon 64 3100+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2 GHz+11%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512K
Process
90 nm
65 nm-28%
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Lima (2008−2009)
PassMark
465
475+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
100
280+180%
Geekbench 6 Multi
100
280+180%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 745 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 3100+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2 memory speed. The Athlon 64 3100+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Pentium M 745) vs 2 (Athlon 64 3100+). PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium M 745) vs 16 (Athlon 64 3100+) — the Athlon 64 3100+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 855GME,Intel 855PM (Pentium M 745) and nForce 500,AMD 690G (Athlon 64 3100+).

FeaturePentium M 745Athlon 64 3100+
Socket
PGA478
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: false (Pentium M 745) vs AMD-V (Athlon 64 3100+). Primary use case: Athlon 64 3100+ targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 3100+ rivals Celeron D 352.

FeaturePentium M 745Athlon 64 3100+
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop