Pentium M 745 vs Sempron 3600+

Intel

Pentium M 745

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron 3600+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 2 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······

Pentium M 745 vs Sempron 3600+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 745 vs Sempron 3600+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 745 vs Sempron 3600+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 745

2004

Why buy it

  • Draws 21W instead of 62W, a 41W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (465 vs 485).

Sempron 3600+

2006

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $105 MSRP, while Pentium M 745 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 195.2% higher power demand at 62W vs 21W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Sempron 3600+ better than Pentium M 745?
    Yes. Sempron 3600+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 4.3% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Sempron 3600+ has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 11.1% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3600+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Sempron 3600+ is the better buy right now. Sempron 3600+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $105 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 4.3% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 3600+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Pentium M 745 vs Sempron 3600+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium M 745

    The Pentium M 745 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 3600+

    The Sempron 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $12.

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium M 745 and Sempron 3600+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Pentium M 745 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3600+ — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Sempron 3600+. The Pentium M 745 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Sempron 3600+ uses Manila (2001−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 745 scores 465 against the Sempron 3600+'s 485 — a 4.2% lead for the Sempron 3600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeaturePentium M 745Sempron 3600+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz
    2 GHz+11%
    Base Clock
    1.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    2 MB
    256K+12700%
    Process
    90 nm
    90 nm
    Architecture
    Dothan (2004−2005)
    Manila (2001−2006)
    PassMark
    465
    485+4%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    100
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    100
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium M 745 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2 on the Pentium M 745 versus DDR2-800 on the Sempron 3600+ — the Sempron 3600+ supports 39900% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Sempron 3600+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

    FeaturePentium M 745Sempron 3600+
    Socket
    PGA478
    AM2
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2
    DDR2-800+39900%
    Max RAM Capacity
    2 GB
    4 GB+100%
    RAM Channels
    1
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization support: false (Pentium M 745) vs None (Sempron 3600+). Primary use case: Sempron 3600+ targets Budget.

    FeaturePentium M 745Sempron 3600+
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    false
    None
    Target Use
    Budget