Pentium M 745 vs Pentium M 750

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium M 745 vs Pentium M 750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium M 745 vs Pentium M 750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium M 745

2004

Why buy it

✅Draws 21W instead of 27W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (465 vs 485).

Pentium M 750

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌28.6% higher power demand at 27W vs 21W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 750 better than Pentium M 745?

Yes. Pentium M 750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 4.3% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 750 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 3.3% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 750 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 4.3% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Pentium M 745 vs Pentium M 750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium M 745

The Pentium M 745 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 750

The Pentium M 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 745 and Pentium M 750 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Pentium M 745 versus 1.86 GHz on the Pentium M 750 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Pentium M 750 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). Both are built on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture using a 90 nm process. In PassMark, the Pentium M 745 scores 465 against the Pentium M 750's 485 — a 4.2% lead for the Pentium M 750. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium M 745	Pentium M 750
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	1.86 GHz+3%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	1.86 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	90 nm	90 nm
Architecture	Dothan (2004−2005)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	465	485+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	100	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	100	—