Pentium M 745
VS
Celeron 430

Pentium M 745 vs Celeron 430

Intel

Pentium M 745

1 Cores1 Thrd21 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2004
VS
Intel

Celeron 430

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 745 is positioned at rank 820 and the Celeron 430 is on rank 1010, so the Pentium M 745 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 745

#808
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1262%
#809
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1243%
#810
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1142%
#811
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1136%
#812
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1126%
#814
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1087%
#815
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1043%
#816
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1041%
#817
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1013%
#820
Pentium M 745
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#824
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#825
Pentium P6100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16.39
97%
#827
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
96%
#829
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
96%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 430

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
34104%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
32225%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
23398%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7049%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5583%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4884%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2798%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2761%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2514%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2514%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2486%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2419%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2385%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2375%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2354%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
100%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
99%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
98%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
98%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
97%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
97%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
96%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
95%
#1020
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
95%
#1021
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
95%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
94%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
92%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
92%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 430 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 745 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium M 745Celeron 430
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium M 745Celeron 430
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 745 and Celeron 430

Intel

Pentium M 745

The Pentium M 745 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 430

The Celeron 430 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium M 745 and Celeron 430 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Pentium M 745 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 430 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Pentium M 745 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron 430 uses Conroe-L (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 745 scores 465 against the Celeron 430's 448 — a 3.7% lead for the Pentium M 745. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 100 vs 226, a 77.3% lead for the Celeron 430 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium M 745Celeron 430
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
90 nm
65 nm-28%
Architecture
Dothan (2004−2005)
Conroe-L (2007−2008)
PassMark
465+4%
448
Geekbench 6 Single
100
226+126%
Geekbench 6 Multi
100
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium M 745 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 430 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2 memory speed. The Celeron 430 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Pentium M 745) vs 2 (Celeron 430). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 855GME,Intel 855PM (Pentium M 745) and 945,G31,G41 (Celeron 430).

FeaturePentium M 745Celeron 430
Socket
PGA478
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: false (Pentium M 745) vs No (Celeron 430). Primary use case: Celeron 430 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 430 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeaturePentium M 745Celeron 430
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
No
Target Use
Budget