
Quadro 2000

Radeon HD 8570
Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 8570 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 8570 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 8570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro 2000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 200W, a 138W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌499% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Radeon HD 8570
2012Why buy it
- ✅84.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 496.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌222.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 62W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 2000 vs Radeon HD 8570 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2000
The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 8570
The Radeon HD 8570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 944 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000 scores 948 and the Radeon HD 8570 reaches 944 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 8570 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8570). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8570).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 948 | 944 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1280+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS+433% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 320 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8570 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 8570 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8570. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2000) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8570) — the Radeon HD 8570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Quadro 2000) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8570). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (11_1)+9% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000) vs No (Radeon HD 8570). Decoder: VP4 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | No |
| Decoder | VP4 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000 draws 62W versus the Radeon HD 8570's 200W — a 105.3% difference. The Quadro 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000) vs 300W (Radeon HD 8570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W-69% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 178mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 15.3+226% | 4.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro 2000 came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 8570 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8570 was 83.3% cheaper ($499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000) vs 9.4 (Radeon HD 8570) — the Radeon HD 8570 offers 487.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8570 (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 2000 | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $100-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 9.4+488% |
| Codename | GF106 | Pitcairn |
| Release | December 24 2010 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #902 | #460 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














