Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000

2010

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 62W instead of 300W, a 238W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
330.9% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025

Why buy it

✅91.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $460 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 318.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌383.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 62W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 91.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 2000 instead at 948 vs 921, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E makes the most sense to buy today. It is $460 cheaper on MSRP at $139 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 318.7% (6.6 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000 scores 948 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E).

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
G3D Mark Score	948+3%	921
Architecture	Fermi	Bristol Ridge
Process Node	40 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	192	4096+2033%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+9867%
ROPs	16	128+700%
TMUs	32	256+700%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E carries 512 MB. Quadro 2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro 2000) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000 draws 62W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 131.5% difference. The Quadro 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
TDP	62W-79%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	178mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	15.3+394%	3.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000 came in at $599, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E was 76.8% cheaper ($460 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000) vs 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E offers 312.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 2000	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP	$599	$139-77%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	6.6+313%
Codename	GF106	Navi 48
Release	December 24 2010	July 23 2025
Ranking	#902	#23

Search Quadro 2000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.