CPU
GPU
Quadro 400
Popular choices:
GeForce 505
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 400 is positioned at rank 360 and the GeForce 505 is on rank 674, so the Quadro 400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 505
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 505 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce 505 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 505.
| Insight | Quadro 400 | GeForce 505 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 505 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $500 for the Quadro 400, it costs 97% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 3143.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 400 | GeForce 505 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3143.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 400 and GeForce 505
Quadro 400
The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.
GeForce 505
The GeForce 505 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 400 scores 148 and the GeForce 505 reaches 144 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 400 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 505 uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 400) vs 2,048 (GeForce 505). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce 505). Boost clocks: 1252 MHz vs 1155 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce 505 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 148+3% | 144 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2048+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.641 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+638% |
| Boost Clock | 1252 MHz+8% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 16 | 64+300% |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 2 MB+2122% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce 505 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) vs 2 MB (GeForce 505) — the GeForce 505 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce 505 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_1 (Quadro 400) vs 10.1 (GeForce 505). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce 505 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_1 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 400 draws 30W versus the GeForce 505's 25W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce 505 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 400) vs 350W (GeForce 505). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce 505 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 25W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 64mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9 | 5.8+18% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 400 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce 505 launched at $99 and now averages $15. The GeForce 505 costs 97% less ($485 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (Quadro 400) vs 9.6 (GeForce 505) — the GeForce 505 offers 3100% better value. The GeForce 505 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce 505 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $99-41% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $15-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 9.6+3100% |
| Codename | GP107 | GA107 |
| Release | February 7 2017 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #741 | #407 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 400 and GeForce 505
