CPU
GPU
Quadro 400
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 400 is positioned at rank #360 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 400
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6700% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 400.
| Insight | Quadro 400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6700%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6700%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+1100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $500), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 56566.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+56566.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 400 and GeForce GTX 1060
Quadro 400
The Quadro 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $119.99.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro 400 scores 148 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 6700%. The Quadro 400 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 400) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro 400) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1252 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 148 | 10,064+6700% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2560+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.641 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+1284% |
| Boost Clock | 1252 MHz | 1733 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 160+900% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 960 KB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 400) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_1 (Quadro 400) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_1 | 12+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 400 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 142.9% difference. The Quadro 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 400) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-83% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9 | 55.9+1041% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 400 launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 88% less ($440 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (Quadro 400) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 55800% better value. The Quadro 400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro 400 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-32% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $60-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 167.7+55800% |
| Codename | GP107 | GP104 |
| Release | February 7 2017 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #741 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 400 and GeForce GTX 1060
