Quadro 5000 vs Radeon R9 350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 5000 vs Radeon R9 350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 5000 vs Radeon R9 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 5000

2011

Why buy it

✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 152W instead of 300W, a 148W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2424.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R9 350

2015

Why buy it

✅41.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2469.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌97.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 152W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (1,998 vs 1,963), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,400 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2469.2% (20.2 vs 0.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 5000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 5000 vs Radeon R9 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 5000

The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon R9 350

The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5000 scores 1,963 and the Radeon R9 350 reaches 1,998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (Quadro 5000) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350).

Feature	Quadro 5000	Radeon R9 350
G3D Mark Score	1,963	1,998+2%
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	352	2560+627%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7223 TFLOPS	5.12 TFLOPS+609%
ROPs	40	64+60%
TMUs	44	160+264%
L1 Cache	704 KB+10%	640 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 5000	Radeon R9 350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5000 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 carries 2 GB. Quadro 5000 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 350. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (Quadro 5000) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 350) — the Radeon R9 350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 5000	Radeon R9 350
VRAM Capacity	2.5 GB+25%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1 MB+59%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5000 draws 152W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W — a 65.5% difference. The Quadro 5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro 5000	Radeon R9 350
TDP	152W-49%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	12.9+93%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon R9 350 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R9 350 was 96% cheaper ($2400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (Quadro 5000) vs 20.2 (Radeon R9 350) — the Radeon R9 350 offers 2425% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 350 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro 5000	Radeon R9 350
MSRP	$2499	$99-96%
Performance per Dollar	0.8	20.2+2425%
Codename	GF100	Grenada
Release	February 23 2011	June 18 2015
Ranking	#687	#296

Search Quadro 5000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.