Quadro 5000 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro 5000
Popular choices:
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 5000 is positioned at rank #367 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 5000 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Pro Graphics 580 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5000 and Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Iris Pro Graphics 580
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5000 scores 1,963 and the Iris Pro Graphics 580 reaches 1,985 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000 is built on Fermi while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 352 (Quadro 5000) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Raw compute: 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 580).
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,963 | 1,985+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 352 | 576+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7223 TFLOPS | 1.094 TFLOPS+51% |
| ROPs | 40+344% | 9 |
| TMUs | 44 | 72+64% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 5000 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 0 MB. The Quadro 5000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5000 draws 152W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 580's 45W — a 108.6% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000) vs 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 152W | 45W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9 | 44.1+242% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 5000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.6 (Quadro 5000) vs Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) — the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | Skylake GT4e |
| Release | February 23 2011 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #687 | #707 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 5000 and Iris Pro Graphics 580
