Quadro 5000 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
Quadro 5000
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 670MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 5000 is positioned at rank 367 and the GeForce GTX 670MX is on rank 111, so the GeForce GTX 670MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 670MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 670MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 20% more VRAM (3 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 5000.
| Insight | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 670MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+20%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 670MX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5000 and GeForce GTX 670MX
Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
GeForce GTX 670MX
The GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,978 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5000 scores 1,963 and the GeForce GTX 670MX reaches 1,978 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 670MX uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (Quadro 5000) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 670MX). Raw compute: 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000) vs 1.154 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670MX).
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 670MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,963 | 1,978 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 960+173% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7223 TFLOPS | 1.154 TFLOPS+60% |
| ROPs | 40+67% | 24 |
| TMUs | 44 | 80+82% |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+780% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+67% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 670MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 5000 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 670MX has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 670MX offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (Quadro 5000) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670MX) — the Quadro 5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 670MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2.5 GB | 3 GB+20% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+67% | 384 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5000 draws 152W versus the GeForce GTX 670MX's 75W — a 67.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 670MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 670MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 152W | 75W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9 | 26.4+105% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 670MX is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 670MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | GF100 | GK104 |
| Release | February 23 2011 | October 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #687 | #684 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 5000 and GeForce GTX 670MX
