
Quadro 5000 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE

Quadro 5000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 460 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 5000 is positioned at rank #367 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+150%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 460 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 460 SE holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 102.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+102.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5000 and GeForce GTX 460 SE

Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.

GeForce GTX 460 SE
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5000 scores 1,963 and the GeForce GTX 460 SE reaches 1,988 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 460 SE uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 352 (Quadro 5000) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Raw compute: 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE).
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,963 | 1,988+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 352+22% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7223 TFLOPS | 0.7488 TFLOPS+4% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 44 | 48+9% |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+83% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 5000 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB. The Quadro 5000 offers 150% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (Quadro 5000) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the Quadro 5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2.5 GB+150% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5000 draws 152W versus the GeForce GTX 460 SE's 150W — a 1.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 152W | 150W-1% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9 | 13.3+3% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 5000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE launched at $160 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 460 SE costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.6 (Quadro 5000) vs 39.8 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the GeForce GTX 460 SE offers 103.1% better value. The Quadro 5000 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 5000 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $160-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $50-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6 | 39.8+103% |
| Codename | GF100 | GF104 |
| Release | February 23 2011 | November 15 2010 |
| Ranking | #687 | #683 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












