Quadro 5000 vs Radeon R9 M385X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 5000 vs Radeon R9 M385X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 5000 vs Radeon R9 M385X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 5000

2011

Why buy it

✅12.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅400% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
733% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌102.7% higher power demand at 152W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M385X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 746.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 152W, a 77W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 5000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M385X instead at 1,994 vs 1,963, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M385X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,199 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 746.2% (6.6 vs 0.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M385X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 5000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 5000 vs Radeon R9 M385X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 5000

The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon R9 M385X

The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 5000 scores 1,963 and the Radeon R9 M385X reaches 1,994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M385X uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (Quadro 5000) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385X). Raw compute: 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385X).

Feature	Quadro 5000	Radeon R9 M385X
G3D Mark Score	1,963	1,994+2%
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	352	896+155%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7223 TFLOPS	1.971 TFLOPS+173%
ROPs	40+150%	16
TMUs	44	56+27%
L1 Cache	704 KB+214%	224 KB
L2 Cache	640 KB+150%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 5000	Radeon R9 M385X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 5000 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385X carries 512 MB. Quadro 5000 gives you 400% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385X. L2 Cache: 640 KB (Quadro 5000) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M385X) — the Quadro 5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 5000	Radeon R9 M385X
VRAM Capacity	2.5 GB+400%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	640 KB+150%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 5000 draws 152W versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 75W — a 67.8% difference. The Radeon R9 M385X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 5000	Radeon R9 M385X
TDP	152W	75W-51%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	12.9	26.6+106%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon R9 M385X launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M385X was 88% cheaper ($2199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (Quadro 5000) vs 6.6 (Radeon R9 M385X) — the Radeon R9 M385X offers 725% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M385X (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro 5000	Radeon R9 M385X
MSRP	$2499	$300-88%
Performance per Dollar	0.8	6.6+725%
Codename	GF100	Strato
Release	February 23 2011	May 5 2015
Ranking	#687	#681

Search Quadro 5000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M385X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.