Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro 5000

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 5000

2011Core: 513 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro 5000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro 5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,444 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 4464.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 152W, a 127W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 5000

2011

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 5000 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 4443.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
  • 508% higher power demand at 152W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,972 vs 1,963), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe MAX Graphics makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,444 cheaper on MSRP at $55 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4464.5% (35.9 vs 0.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 5000 has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro 5000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 5000

The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the Quadro 5000 reaches 1,963 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the Quadro 5000 uses Fermi, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 352 (Quadro 5000). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000).

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsQuadro 5000
G3D Mark Score
1,972
1,963
Architecture
Generation 12.1
Fermi
Process Node
10 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
768+118%
352
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.534 TFLOPS+251%
0.7223 TFLOPS
ROPs
24
40+67%
TMUs
48+9%
44
L2 Cache
1 MB+59%
0.63 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsQuadro 5000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000 carries 3 GB. Quadro 5000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 64-bit on the Quadro 5000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 0.63 MB (Quadro 5000) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsQuadro 5000
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+59%
0.63 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the Quadro 5000's 152W — a 143.5% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 350W (Quadro 5000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsQuadro 5000
TDP
25W-84%
152W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
78.9+512%
12.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics came in at $55, while the Quadro 5000 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Iris Xe MAX Graphics was 97.8% cheaper ($2444 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.9 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 0.8 (Quadro 5000) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers 4387.5% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe MAX Graphics (2020 vs 2011).

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsQuadro 5000
MSRP
$55-98%
$2499
Performance per Dollar
35.9+4388%
0.8
Codename
DG1
GF100
Release
October 31 2020
February 23 2011
Ranking
#686
#687

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.