Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R9 350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R9 350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R9 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Delivers 77.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 300W, a 275W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 350

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Iris Xe MAX Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 350 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
80% HIGHER MSRP
$99 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
❌1100% higher power demand at 300W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 350 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,998 vs 1,972), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 350 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Xe MAX Graphics makes the most sense to buy today. It is $44 cheaper on MSRP at $55 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 77.7% (35.9 vs 20.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R9 350 has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R9 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

Radeon R9 350

The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the Radeon R9 350 reaches 1,998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Radeon R9 350
G3D Mark Score	1,972	1,998+1%
Architecture	Generation 12.1	GCN 2.0
Process Node	10 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2560+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.534 TFLOPS	5.12 TFLOPS+102%
Boost Clock	1650 MHz+65%	1000 MHz
ROPs	24	64+167%
TMUs	48	160+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Radeon R9 350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 350 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 350.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Radeon R9 350
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Radeon R9 350
DirectX	12.1	12_0
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 3.1.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Radeon R9 350
Encoder	QuickSync	VCE 1.0
Decoder	QuickSync	UVD 3.1
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W — a 169.2% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Radeon R9 350
TDP	25W-92%	300W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	78.9+1078%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics came in at $55, while the Radeon R9 350 launched at $99. On MSRP, Iris Xe MAX Graphics was 44.4% cheaper ($44 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.9 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 20.2 (Radeon R9 350) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers 77.7% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe MAX Graphics (2020 vs 2015).

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Radeon R9 350
MSRP	$55-44%	$99
Performance per Dollar	35.9+78%	20.2
Codename	DG1	Grenada
Release	October 31 2020	June 18 2015
Ranking	#686	#296

Search Iris Xe MAX Graphics on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.