Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Popular choices:
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is positioned at rank #139 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
| Insight | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) | RDNA 2 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 26 2022. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) uses RDNA 2, both on 10 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 128 (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972 | 2,000+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | RDNA 2 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+500% | 128 |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2200 MHz+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)'s 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 1W (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 15W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9 | 133.3+69% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs Infinity (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) — the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | DG1 | Raphael |
| Release | October 31 2020 | September 26 2022 |
| Ranking | #686 | #729 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
