Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

2022Boost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

2022

Why buy it

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2022 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $55 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (2,000 vs 1,972), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 10nm, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe MAX Graphics makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

AMD

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 26 2022. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is built on Generation 12.1 while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) uses RDNA 2, both on 10 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 128 (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
G3D Mark Score
1,972
2,000+1%
Architecture
Generation 12.1
RDNA 2
Process Node
10 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
768+500%
128
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2200 MHz+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe MAX Graphics and System on the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000).

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)'s 15W — a 50% difference. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 1W (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
TDP
25W
15W-40%
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
78.9
133.3+69%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics came in at $55, while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) was 100+% cheaper ($55 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.9 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs Infinity (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) — the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (2022 vs 2020).

FeatureIris Xe MAX GraphicsRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
MSRP
$55
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
35.9
Infinity
Codename
DG1
Raphael
Release
October 31 2020
September 26 2022
Ranking
#686
#729

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.