Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Popular choices:
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is positioned at rank 139 and the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is on rank 572, so the Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3.
| Insight | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $300 for the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3, it costs 87% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 659.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+659.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,947 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 reaches 1,947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,972+1% | 1,947 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 7 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3's 7W — a 112.5% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 7W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.9 | 278.1+252% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 launched at $599 and now averages $300. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics costs 86.7% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.3 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 6.5 (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers 658.5% better value. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Iris Xe MAX Graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-91% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-87% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3+658% | 6.5 |
| Codename | DG1 | — |
| Release | October 31 2020 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #686 | #915 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe MAX Graphics and Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
