Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $544 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1003.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌257.1% higher power demand at 25W vs 7W.

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 25W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
989.1% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,972 vs 1,947), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2020 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Iris Xe MAX Graphics makes the most sense to buy today. It is $544 cheaper on MSRP at $55 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1003.1% (35.9 vs 3.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,947 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics scores 1,972 and the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 reaches 1,947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
G3D Mark Score	1,972+1%	1,947
Process Node	10 nm	7 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe MAX Graphics and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics draws 25W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3's 7W — a 112.5% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
TDP	25W	7W-72%
Recommended PSU	1W	1W
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	78.9	278.1+252%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics came in at $55, while the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 launched at $599. On MSRP, Iris Xe MAX Graphics was 90.8% cheaper ($544 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.9 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) vs 3.3 (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers 987.9% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe MAX Graphics (2020 vs 2018).

Feature	Iris Xe MAX Graphics	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
MSRP	$55-91%	$599
Performance per Dollar	35.9+988%	3.3
Codename	DG1	—
Release	October 31 2020	December 6 2018
Ranking	#686	#915

Search Iris Xe MAX Graphics on Amazon

Search Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.